USPTO serial 75505161
ISHIP.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISHIP.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ATLANTA, GA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Bellevue, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARK W. LACKERT
CLARK W LACKERT KING & SPALDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY ON-LINE MERCHANTS FOR MANAGING AND TRACKING SMALL PARCEL SHIPMENTS, AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | SHIPPING INFORMATION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK REGARDING THE SHIPPING, TRACKING AND MANAGING OF SMALL PARCELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING TECHNICAL INFORMATION ABOUT COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, PROVIDING CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE WITH COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROVIDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE UPDATES IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE FOR SHIPPING, TRACKING AND MANAGING OF SMALL PARCELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISHIP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STAMPS.COM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STAMPS.COM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by iShip.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ISHIP.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |