Drawing for KWIK KAR MOBILE LUBE

USPTO serial 75505606

KWIK KAR MOBILE LUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KWIK KAR MOBILE LUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS

KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY, ROSE & RAYON, PC5800 GRANITE PKWY STE 400PLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance