USPTO serial 75505628
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R DREITLER
Joseph R. Dreitler Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease52 E. Gay StreetColumbus, OH 43216-1008UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Substances for laundry use, namely, bleach, non-chlorine bleach, fabric softener, laundry starch, laundry detergent; removing preparations for lacquer, paint, rust, grease, polyurethane, dye, enamel, powder coatings, wood stains and varnish; wallpaper cleaning preparations; soaps, namely disinfectant soaps, medicated soaps for hands, face, and body | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |