Drawing for HAVANA NIGHT

USPTO serial 75505671

HAVANA NIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAVANA NIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A SLAVIN

MICHAEL A SLAVIN MCHALE & SLAVIN, PA2855 PGA BLVDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING MADE IN HAVANA, CUBA, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, HATS, SCARVES, UNIFORMS, AND CABARET COSTUMESACTIVEApr 25, 2000
041DINNER THEATER SERVICES AND THE PRODUCTION OF SOUND RECORDINGS ON COMPACT DISKS AND CASSETTE TAPES HAVING THEIR ORIGINS IN HAVANA, CUBAACTIVEApr 25, 2000
042CABARET SERVICES HAVING THEIR ORIGIN IN HAVANA, CUBAACTIVEApr 25, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 27, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 28, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance