USPTO serial 75505671
HAVANA NIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAVANA NIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A SLAVIN
MICHAEL A SLAVIN MCHALE & SLAVIN, PA2855 PGA BLVDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING MADE IN HAVANA, CUBA, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, HATS, SCARVES, UNIFORMS, AND CABARET COSTUMES | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2000 |
| 041 | DINNER THEATER SERVICES AND THE PRODUCTION OF SOUND RECORDINGS ON COMPACT DISKS AND CASSETTE TAPES HAVING THEIR ORIGINS IN HAVANA, CUBA | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2000 |
| 042 | CABARET SERVICES HAVING THEIR ORIGIN IN HAVANA, CUBA | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Show & Music U.K. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by International Show & Music U.K. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HAVANA NIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |