USPTO serial 75506425
AGE REVERSAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2363375Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2000
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AGE REVERSAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
William H. Cox Cox Law Firm LLC7 BoardwalkUnit 6Sparta, NJ 07871Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin creams, skin moisturizers, skin toners, astringents for cosmetic purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |