Drawing for RAJIN' CAJUN

USPTO serial 75507088

RAJIN' CAJUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RAJIN' CAJUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE E O'CONNOR

BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029sausages, namely smoked and fresh sausages, wieners, frankfurters; meat products, namely ham, pork, beef, poultry, namely chicken and turkeyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 20, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 28, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 1, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 18, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 13, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance