USPTO serial 75507237
INTER QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTER QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Quebec J3Z 1N5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY A COOPER
BARRY A COOPER GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and multimedia software stored on DVD, CD-ROM, hard disk or computer diskettes and available on interactive media, such as the internet and intranets, as well as a user's manuals which accompany the software; electronic equipment for generating composite pictures which include one or more electronic chips and a liquid crystal display, all of the foregoing for use in the field of crime prevention , crime solving, public education of various types and educational games of various types | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Educational games of various types | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |