USPTO serial 75507392
EDISON EV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDISON EV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD E LYON JR
RICHARD E LYON JR HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP633 W FIFTH ST 21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | battery chargers for electric vehicles for on and off-road use, electric material handling vehicles, electric scooters and electric bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |