Drawing for 100 DAY WIN

USPTO serial 75507410

100 DAY WIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 100 DAY WIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW P BRIDGES

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 FAE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, and manuals sold as a unit, for managing, controlling and monitoring distribution and publication of documents and data over electronic communications networks, for modification, collaborative development, and maintaining the security of data and documents, for software development, and for managing, monitoring and controlling operations of electronic communications networksACTIVE—
042Computer consultation; computer software design and customization for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 15, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance