Drawing for NANOGRAM

USPTO serial 75507671

NANOGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Bondi

MICHAEL A BONDI PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN4800 IDS CTR 80 SIXTH 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001SUBMICRON METAL POWDERS AND SUBMICRON POWDERS OF SILICON COMPOSITIONS; LIQUID DISPERSIONS OF SUBMICRON CHEMICAL POWDERS, NAMELY AQUEOUS DISPERSIONS AND DISPERSIONS IN ORGANIC SOLVENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ABRASIVE COMPOSITIONS, BATTERIES, BATTERY ELECTRODES, CAPACITORS, CATALYSTS, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS; ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBING MATERIALS, ELECTROMAGNETIC SHIELDING, AND SOLAR CELLSACTIVE—
003ABRASIVE AND POLISHING PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN SURFACE POLISHINGACTIVE—
006SUBMICRON METAL POWDERS AND SUBMICRON METAL PARTICLES SOLD IN BULKACTIVE—
009BATTERY ELECTRODESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 11, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 30, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance