USPTO serial 75507929
SKILLOBJECT DESIGNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKILLOBJECT DESIGNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Kyle Ferguson
L. Kyle Ferguson Ferguson Law Group, P.C.2500 Dallas ParkwaySuite 260Plano, TX 75093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING OCCUPATION SPECIFIC SKILLS WHEREIN SAID COMPUTER SOFTWARE INTERACTS WITH AN ON-LINE DATA REPOSITORY VIA THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROWN, MICHAEL L.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Michael L.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Michael L.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, Michael L.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SKILLOBJECT DESIGNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |