USPTO serial 75507985
VIKING CIVES(USA)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIKING CIVES(USA)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN L HELLER
SUSAN L HELLER HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RA3 EMBARCADERO CTR 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | ornamental iron, namely, stairs, stair rails and window grillwork(Based on Intent to Use) | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | snow plows, snow blowers, vehicle components and parts associated with snow and ice control, namely, trip mechanisms, hydraulic lifting mechanisms, control handles for directing the plow, frames to support the plow, and cutting blades at the road level; mechanical material spreaders for the purpose of controlling snow and ice on roads by spreading sand, salt and the like; hydraulic pumps, cylinders, fabricated structural steel parts for snow plows and snow blowers, hoppers and conveyors, namely, steel supports, rollers, and rails that move products from vats in a large manufacturing plant(Based on Intent to Use) | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | dump truck bodies and hoists; snow plow or snow blower attachment straps for vehicles(Based on Intent to Use) | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | repairing, servicing, rebuilding and reconditioning snow plows, snow blowers, harnesses for mounting snow plows and blowers on vehicles, vehicle components and parts associated with snow and ice control, vehicle dump bodies, dump body hoists, material spreaders for sand, salt and the like for control of snow and ice on roads, hydraulic pumps, valves, cylinders and circuits, fabricated structural steel, ornamental iron, platework, ductwork, hoppers and conveyors | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 040 | custom manufacture of snow plows, snow blowers, harnesses for mounting snow plows and blowers on vehicles, vehicle components and parts associated with snow and ice control, vehicle dump bodies, dump body hoists, material spreaders for sand, salt and the like for control of snow and ice on roads, hydraulic pumps, valves, cylinders and circuits, fabricated structural steel, ornamental iron, platework, ductwork, hoppers and conveyors to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cives Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cives Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VIKING CIVES(USA)
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |