USPTO serial 75508043
THE MOST POWERFUL WAVE IN WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2652130Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE MOST POWERFUL WAVE IN WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH S SHEPHERD
DEBORAH S SHEPHERD KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | POWER AMPLIFIERS; RACKS, COMBINERS, AND CABINETS FOR POWER AMPLIFIERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE MOST POWERFUL WAVE IN WIRELESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |