Drawing for INVISTA

USPTO serial 75508106

INVISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INVISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009client-server software for managing multiple-tier computer networks; computer software, namely, software for managing and providing access to databases and files over global and local computer networks; software for use over networks, namely, communications software for use in transmitting data and multimedia information over global and local computer networks; software for use over networks, namely, network management software, data delivery software, network utility software, and communications software; computer software, namely, legacy system management programs; computer software for facilitating the transmission and reception of data via a global computer network and other computer networks; computer software, namely, software for managing and providing access to databases over global and local computer networks; computer software for use in software development; computer software for emulating performance characteristics of multiple computer software operating environments; computer software, namely, assemblers, compilers, development environment software, offloading software, source code generators, debugging software, graphic user interface development software tools, file access, transfer and handling software, source code management software, computer code analysis software tools, key and data compression software, software tools for integrating development environments, and operating system extension and runtime software; computer software, namely, programs for maintaining and testing computer software,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance