Drawing for TWINDOSE

USPTO serial 75508746

TWINDOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWINDOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F.T. Alexandra Mahaney

FT ALEXANDRA MAHANEY WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI12235 EL CAMINO REAL, STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Auto-injectors containing epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylactic reactions and severe life-threatening asthma attacksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 8, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 9, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 15, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 10, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 1, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 12, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 22, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance