USPTO serial 75509386
CARDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory Smith
GREGORY SMITH GREGORY SMITH & ASSOCIATES3900 NEWPARK MALL RD STE 317NEWARK, CA 94560UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | cardiothoracic surgery devices and instruments, namely catheters, introducers for placement of catheters, guidewires, occluders, probes, drug delivery devices, percutaneous vascular access ports, syringes, tubing sets, trocars, pinch tubes, heart valve prostheses and holders for heart valve prostheses, retractors, forceps, grapers, porous balloons, knives, needle drivers, scalpels, staplers, anastomosis devices, scissors, sutures, electrocautery devices, cannulae, blood filters, blood filter systems, external valves, internal valves, pressure monitoring gauges, porous balloons, shunts, therapeutic catheter systems, stents, atherectomy devices, aspirators, atrial isolators, tissue supports, sealing devices, perfusion devices, neurology and neurosurgery devices, namely instruments used in the treatment of stroke, ischemia, infarcts, and other diseases and injuries of the central and cerebral system, cardiopulmonary support and perfusion devices and instruments, namely extracorporeal pumps, exgenators, heat exchangers, monitoring equipment, switches, stroke treatment prevention devices and instruments namely catheters, drug delivery devices, introducers for placement of catheters, guidewires, occluders, probes, percutaneous vascular access ports, tubing sets, trocars, heart valve prostheses and holders for heart valve prostheses, retractors, forceps, graspers, knives, needle drivers, staplers, scalpels, scissors, sutures, electrocautery devices, cannulae, blood filters, blood filter systems, external valves, internal valves, pressure monitoring gauges, porous balloons, shunts, therapeutic catheter systems, stents atherectomy devices, aspirators, atrial isolators and tissue supports, sealing devices and perfusion devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |