Drawing for FARM BUREAU COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75509919

FARM BUREAU COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARM BUREAU COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN, LLPSTE 6001300 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS; AND, MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTSACTIVE—
038COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PAGING SERVICES, LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES, PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK, SATELLITE TV TRANSMISSION SERVICESACTIVE—
042AGRICULTURAL INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, WEATHER FORECASTING AND REPORTING FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, PROVIDING LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION IMPACTING AGRICULTURE, AND PROVIDING GOVERNMENT AGENCY INFORMATION, NAMELY, AGRICULTURAL REGULATORY INFORMATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 18, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 27, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance