Drawing for THE VIRTUAL JEWELER

USPTO serial 75509955

THE VIRTUAL JEWELER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE VIRTUAL JEWELER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH D NOWAK

KEITH D NOWAK LIEBERMAN & NOWAK LLP805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail and wholesale shopping services featuring jewelry and precious stonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance