USPTO serial 75509989
ADMIRALS CLUB SERVICE CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADMIRALS CLUB SERVICE CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ AMERICAN AIRLINESMD 5675 (6W5B-57)P O BOX 619696DFW AIRPORT, TX 75261-9616Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel services, namely, offering transportation reservation services, ticketing services, and itinerary modification services for member travelers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |