USPTO serial 75510145
ACADEMY OF LATIN MUSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACADEMY OF LATIN MUSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
SANTA MONICA, CA
Other trademarks owned by The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
SANTA MONICA, CA
Other trademarks owned by The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM GREENBERG TRAURIG3290 NORTHSIDE PKWY STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services rendered through the medium of an annual live and televised awards program dealing and promoting Latin music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The National Academy for Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gibson Guitar Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ACADEMY OF LATIN MUSIC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |