USPTO serial 75510174
Serial No. 75510174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75510174?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Yorkshire, HG1 4AY, GB
North Yorkshire, HG1 4AY, GB
North Yorkshire, HG1 4AY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW H SIMPSON
ANDREW H SIMPSON KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS, UNPROCESSED LIQUID PLASTICS FOR USE WITH TAPE FOR THE PROTECTION OF PIPE INSULATION AND OF ASBETOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 1992 |
| 002 | PROTECTIVE COATINGS MADE FROM LIQUID PLASTICS FOR USE IN REPAIRING, BONDING, COATING, FILLING, CEMENTING, MOLDING, WATER PROOFING, PRESERVING AND PROTECTING BRICK, STONE, CONCRETE, METAL, WOOD OR NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC RUBBER; SEALER COATINGS FOR APPLICATION BY BRUSH OR SPRAY GUN FOR USE IN THE PROTECTION OF PIPE INSULATION AND PIPE CLADDING AND FOR COATING ASBESTOS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belzona Polymerics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Belzona Polymerics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Belzona Polymerics Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |