Drawing for EDGE GUARD

USPTO serial 75510203

EDGE GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EDGE GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael P. Williams

MICHAEL P WILLIAMS BOND SCHOENECK & KING LLPONE LINCOLN CTRSYRACUSE, NY 13202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Plastic weatherproof boxes for enclosing wiring devicesACTIVEJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 1, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 1, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance