USPTO serial 75510599
FOUNDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOUNDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BURNS DOAN SWECKER & MATHIS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publishing system comprising computer, computer word processor, computer data processor, microfilm reader, and film developing machines, hard disk drive, blank optical disks, blank floppy disks, blank computer hard disks, magnetically-encoded identity cards, computer indicators, namely, lights, buzzers, and monitors, computer-controlled photo composition machines for use in printing, optical scanner, main frame computers, still and video cameras, computer image processor, Chinese Character magnetically encoded process card, electronic plotter, computer printers, electric color scanner, film developing machine, blank cinematographic film, office automation system comprising graduated rulers, calculators, mini-computer, computer, computer machines for making digraph, tape recorder, computer input device, namely, electric pen, couplers for electrical connection, fax machine, audio and video recorder, computer keyboards, software for electronic dictionary, photocopiers, automated ticket dispensing machines, score keeping machine for sports contest, pedometer, automatic teller machine (ATM), electronic machine for registering checks, cash register, automatic drink-selling machine, magnetic card readers and smart card reader, ticket printer, magnetic card reader, integrated circuit card reader, communications equipment, namely, radiotelegraphy set and radio telephony set, musical entertainment phonograph records and blank records, signal lantern, satellite receiver, telephones, computer software for desktop publishing, computer program for desktop publishing pre-print processing, operating software for office automation system, software platform for developing multi-media software, and automatic finger-print identification scanners, software for managing a database, and integrated circuits and computer memory, computer network bridges, modems, industrial control devices and communications control devices in the nature of electrical controllers, network cards, hubs and net servers | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |