USPTO serial 75511032
MILLENNIUM BUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILLENNIUM BUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE W LONGBOTTOM
JAMES A COLES BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS, LLP2700 FIRST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All-purpose cleaners, automobile polish, baby oil, bath beads, body oil, body powder, cologne, cold creams and cosmetics, namely, skin creams, and hair lotion, hair conditioners, hand lotions, cotton balls for cosmetic purposes, skin cream, laundry detergents, eye makeup, facial masks, furniture polish, shaving cream, lip gloss, lipstick, hair care preparations, makeup, floor polish, chrome polish, perfume, nail polish, potpourri, carpet shampoo, hair shampoo, soap, sun tan oil, sun screen preparations, toothpaste and automobile wax | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |