Drawing for CLICKYARD

USPTO serial 75511126

CLICKYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLICKYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelena Hallie

Michelena Hallie VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC.c/o Anthony Ortiz 1515 Broadway 34th Fl.New York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing information in the field of entertainment and education rendered via computer by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 13, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 14, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 11, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 31, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance