USPTO serial 75511523
CITISOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITISOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO HYDRO-ELECTRIC COMMISSION
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1K5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R MEYER
JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | public utility services, namely, energy, power, electricity and natural gas generation, distribution and transmission; sale, lease and/or rental of back-up power systems; maintenance and repair of electric and natural gas appliances and equipment; repair and recharging services for electrically powered vehicles; consulting services related to the use, distribution and analysis of energy, power, electricity and natural gas consumption, distribution and transmission; telecommunication services; providing access to the Internet; home security services and installation of home security systems and monitoring thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |