Drawing for TUV INTERNATIONAL GROUP TUV RHEINLAND

USPTO serial 75511527

TUV INTERNATIONAL GROUP TUV RHEINLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TUV INTERNATIONAL GROUP TUV RHEINLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN M LEVY

STEVEN M LEVY PROSKAUER ROSE LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business management and consulting services; business management assistance services; conducting business research and survey servicesACTIVE—
037Construction planning servicesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely conducting classes and seminars in the field of construction, engineering, communications, power techniques, power transmission, power station safety, product safety, environment protection, and industrial safetyACTIVE—
042Technical consulting in the field of construction, engineering, communication, power techniques, power transmission, environmental protection, industrial safety, product safety, power station safety, construction safety, inspection services in the field of construction, engineering, communications, power techniques, power transmission, environmental protection, industrial safety, product safety, power station safety, construction safety, engineering services; material testing services; medical laboratory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance