USPTO serial 75511732
AFD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE C BURKE
MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for decoding digital television broadcast signals; computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits and integrated circuit boards; televisions; video cassette recorders; videodisk recorders; digital television broadcast signal decoders; set top boxes for controlling access to cable, satellite and terrestrial broadcasting, and digital broadcast signal receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |