USPTO serial 75511843
RAYHACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2001
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAYHACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
ARLINGTON, TN
Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
Tampa, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEFAN V STEIN
STEFAN V STEIN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPPO BOX 1288TAMPA, FL 33601-1288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | surgical instruments, namely, bone distractors and contractors and bone implants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Medical Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named RAYHACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |