USPTO serial 75512120
EP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
#03-36 The Adelphi, SG
#03-36 The Adelphi, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D SANOK
JEFFREY D SANOK EVENSON MCKEOWN EDWARDS & LENAHAN PLLC1200 G ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote control apparatus, namely remote controls for lighting and lamps, air conditioners, water heaters, gates, motorized awnings, audiovisual equipment, audio equipment, video equipment, televisions, motion sensors, temperature sensors, fans, cameras, burglar alarms, water fountains, whirlpool baths, and whirlpool spas; remote control equipment, namely remote controls and touch panels for use in monitoring home safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and maintenance of audio and video equipment, apparatus, instruments and their parts and fittings; installation, repair and maintenance of home automation audio and video systems and consultation in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and integration of audio and video equipment into audio and video installations and apparatus, design and integration of home and office automation equipment into home, office and building automation audio and video systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elpa (International) Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Elpa (International) Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |