USPTO serial 75512690
ARCOTUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCOTUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
49525 Lengerich, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARVEY B JACOBSON JR
HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERNTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRINTING MACHINES AS WELL AS COMPONENTS THEREOF; MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BAGS AND/OR SACKS MADE OF PAPER, PLASTIC FILM AND/OR COMBINATIONS OF THESE MATERIALS, MECHANIZED SYSTEMS WITH OR WITHOUT SEPARATE DRIVE FOR THE PALLETIZING AND/OR DEPALLETIZING OF BAG AND/OR SACK STACKS; BAGGING AND PACKAGING MACHINERY; ROBOTS, MANIPULATORS AND COMPONENTS (AUXILLIARY APPLIANCES) FOR THEM WITH OR WITHOUT SEPARATE DRIVE; MACHINES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF PLASTIC TAPES; BLOWN AND CAST FILM EXTRUSION LINES, AS WELL AS COATING AND LAMINATING MACHINES, EQUIPMENT COMPOSED THEREOF AS WELL AS COMPONENTS OF THESE MACHINES, AS WELL AS ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC REGULATING AND CONTROL DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |