Drawing for BEAUTY TIME

USPTO serial 75512872

BEAUTY TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEAUTY TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS A SMART

THOMAS A SMART KAYE SCHOLER FIERMAN, ET AL425 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hair ornamentsACTIVEJan 22, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 23, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Aug 2, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 10, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 9, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 21, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jun 4, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 20, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance