USPTO serial 75513838
LITE' N UP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITE' N UP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D MCCARTHY
KEVIN D MCCARTHY HODGSON RUSS ANDREWSWOODS & GOODYEAR LLP1800 1 M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials for a wellness program to reduce risk of degenerative diseases such cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer, by healthy dining, low-fat cooking techniques, exercises, healthy shopping guidelines, obtaining the optimum body mass and promoting a positive attitude | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, an on-going television program, an on-going radio program, and conducting classes, seminars and workshops, all of the foregoing on a wellness program to reduce risk of degenerative diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer, by healthy dining, low-fat cooking techniques, exercises, healthy shopping guidelines, obtaining the optimum body mass and promoting a positive attitude, on advertisements and brochures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |