USPTO serial 75514135
POWER MUTUAL FUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER MUTUAL FUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Management of mutual funds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |