USPTO serial 75515086
FREEWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC T. FINGERHUT
ERIC T FINGERHUT SHAW PITTMAN POTTS & TROWBRIDGE2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SERVICES, NAMELY, RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING A WIDE RANGE OF CONSUMER GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS EXCLUDING FINANCIAL GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS, PROVIDED VIA TELEPHONE; ELECTRONIC ROUTING OF TELEPHONE SERVICE CUSTOMERS IN THE NATURE OF REFERRING THESE CUSTOMERS TO THIRD-PARTY ADVERTISERS IN A WIDE FIELD OF CONSUMER GOODS AND SERVICES, EXCLUDING FINANCIAL GOODS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA; AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF ORDERS AND SURVEYS BETWEEN CUSTOMERS AND THIRD-PARTY ADVERTISERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Broadpoint Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Broadpoint Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named FREEWAY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |