USPTO serial 75515217
CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J EHLINGER JR
JOHN J EHLINGER JR OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP1617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD 19TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | employee medical cost management services, namely medical cost containment and reviews in the nature of OSHA medical surveillance services, medical cost utilization reviews and medical cost management services for third-party corporations, governmental units and non-profit institutions | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1997 |
| 041 | management of employee medical, health, fitness and rehabilitation services for third-party corporations, governmental units and non-profit institutions | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1997 |
| 042 | employee health and wellness promotion services, namely workers compensation injury treatment and management services; physical therapy and rehabilitation services occupational health services, physical examinations, substance abuse testing, industrial hygiene services medical examinations consulting services, independent medical examinations, functional capacity evaluations, ergonomic evaluations, disability management services, on-site medical facility management and corporate health promotion and wellness services for third-party corporations | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |