USPTO serial 75515652
SBA EXPRESS BNB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SBA EXPRESS BNB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C CURFISS
ROBERT C CURFISS BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPS TWR PENNZOIL PL711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2781Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | business banking, namely small business administration guaranteed loans services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |