USPTO serial 75515819
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen D. Reavis, Esq.
Helen D. Reavis, Esq. Reavis Parent Lehrer LLP41 Madison Avenue41st FloorNew York, NY 10010| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded videotapes, audiotapes, videodiscs and laser discs featuring a motion picture film and television program series about individuals who have chosen to pursue unorthodox career paths and lifestyles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |