USPTO serial 75515823
ENGEL BROTHERS MEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2523559Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2001
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENGEL BROTHERS MEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen D. Reavis, Esq.
Helen D. Reavis, Esq. Reavis Parent Lehrer LLP41 Madison Avenue41st FloorNew York, NY 10010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | educational and entertainment books, booklets, pamphlets and magazines in the fields of biography, science and the natural world, travel, comedic and dramatic situations, music and the arts; notepads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |