USPTO serial 75516144
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H TANNENBAUM
DAVID H TANNENBAUM FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | modems, antennas, frequency synthesizers, computer hardware, data switches and routers, mounting frames, brackets and supports for use with the aforesaid and software all for use in operating, routing and controlling land-based or terrestrial high bandwidth point-to-point microwave communications | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |