Drawing for TRITON NETWORK SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 75516144

TRITON NETWORK SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRITON NETWORK SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H TANNENBAUM

DAVID H TANNENBAUM FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009modems, antennas, frequency synthesizers, computer hardware, data switches and routers, mounting frames, brackets and supports for use with the aforesaid and software all for use in operating, routing and controlling land-based or terrestrial high bandwidth point-to-point microwave communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 2, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 28, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 20, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance