USPTO serial 75516156
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER D. EMERSON
ROGER D. EMERSON Emerson Thomson Bennett1914 Akron Peninsula RoadAkron, OH 44313-4810UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction and repair services, namely, the leveling of concrete slabs for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |