USPTO serial 75516183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARRELL L OLSON
DARRELL L OLSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED AND PAPER GOODS, NAMELY, CALENDARS, POSTERS, NOTECARDS, POSTCARDS, STICKERS, PHOTOGRAPHS, PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS, STATIONERY, AND BOOKS AND MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF THE THEATRE AND OF BARRY MANILOW THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, LIVE THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES INVOLVING BARRY MANILOW | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |