USPTO serial 75516321
PRANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2967312Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2005
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Encinitas, CA
Encinitas, CA
SKYLARK SPORT MARKETING CORPORATION
VISTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by SKYLARK SPORT MARKETING CORPORATION
Encinitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Bolmarcich
GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCONE CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047-6499UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prana Energy Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Prana Energy Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SKYLARK SPORT MARKETING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Prana Energy Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PRANA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |