Drawing for Serial No. 75516355

USPTO serial 75516355

Serial No. 75516355

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75516355?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KERI CHRIST

THERESA CONDUAH MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLPONE CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal key chainsACTIVE—
008hand tools, namely, spoons made of precious metalACTIVE—
009decorative magnetsACTIVE—
011electric night lightsACTIVE—
014ornamental pinsACTIVE—
016paper goods, namely, calendars; Christmas cards; gift cards; greeting cards; note cards; picture postcardsACTIVE—
020picture framesACTIVE—
021house wares and glass, namely, beverage glassware, cups, coffee cups, mugs, glass mugsACTIVE—
022multi-purpose cloth bagsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, caps; sweat shirts, polo shirts, golf shirts, knit shirts, sports shirts, t-shirts, headgearACTIVE—
028Toys and playthings, namely manipulative puzzles, toy boxes; christmas tree ornaments, christmas tree decorationsACTIVE—
030staple foods, namely, cookiesACTIVE—
036real estate services, namely leasing of office space; leasing of real property, leasing of shopping mall space, rental of office spaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 24, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2007CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 3, 2006CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jul 14, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2005CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 19, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 9, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 6, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance