USPTO serial 75516355
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KERI CHRIST
THERESA CONDUAH MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLPONE CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand tools, namely, spoons made of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | decorative magnets | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | electric night lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | ornamental pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | paper goods, namely, calendars; Christmas cards; gift cards; greeting cards; note cards; picture postcards | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | house wares and glass, namely, beverage glassware, cups, coffee cups, mugs, glass mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | multi-purpose cloth bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, caps; sweat shirts, polo shirts, golf shirts, knit shirts, sports shirts, t-shirts, headgear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely manipulative puzzles, toy boxes; christmas tree ornaments, christmas tree decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | staple foods, namely, cookies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | real estate services, namely leasing of office space; leasing of real property, leasing of shopping mall space, rental of office space | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |