USPTO serial 75516357
Serial No. 75516357
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75516357?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KERI CHRIST
KERI CHRIST MILBANK TWEED HADLEY & MCCLOY1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal key chains | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 008 | hand tools, namely, spoons made of precious metal | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 009 | Decorative magnets | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 011 | electric night lights | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2003 |
| 014 | ornamental pins | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 016 | paper goods, namely, calendars; Christmas cards; gift cards; greeting cards; note cards; picture postcards | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 020 | Picture Frames | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 021 | House wares and glass, namely, beverage glassware, cups, coffee cups, mugs, glass mugs | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 022 | multi-purpose cloth bags | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 025 | clothing, namely, caps, sweat shirts, polo shirts, golf shirts, knit shirts, sport shirts, t-shirts, headwear | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely, manipulative puzzles, toy boxes; Christmas tree ornaments, Christmas tree decorations | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 030 | staple foods, namely, cookies | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
| 036 | real estate services, namely leasing of office space; leasing of real property, leasing of shopping mall space, rental of office space | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RCPI LANDMARK PROPERTIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RCPI Trust, a Delaware Business Trust, the trustees comprising Mark Tercek, Dan Neidich, Barry Volpert, Ralph Rosenberg,Richard Salomon and Jerry Speyer, all U.S. citizens, Andrea Bott, a citizen of I
- Other trademarks owned by RCPI Trust, a Delaware Business Trust, the trustees comprising Mark Tercek, Dan Neidich, Barry Volpert, Ralph Rosenberg,Richard Salomon and Jerry Speyer, all U.S. citizens, Andrea Bott, a citizen of I
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |