USPTO serial 75516453
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Splash Manufacturing Corporation
Camumay, Velenzuela, Metro Manila, PH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROD S BERMAN
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER MARMARO LLP2121 AVE OF THE STARS 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND HAIR, FOOT AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS; NAMELY, FACIAL AND BODY CLEANSING PRODUCTS, NAMELY MEDICATED FACIAL LOTIONS, FACIAL EXFOLIANTS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, SCRUBS, SOAPS, GELS, LOTIONS, NONMEDICATED SALTS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, FOUNDATION, FACE POWDER, MASCARA, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, EYELINER, BLUSH, ROUGE, EYESHADOW, EYEBROW PENCIL, POWDER; PERFUMERY, NAMELY PERFUME, COLOGNE, TOILET WATER, AFTERSHAVE; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, DEODORANTS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS, SHAVING CREAM, SHAVING LOTION, SHAVING GEL, BUBBLE BATH, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR MOUSSE, SCALP CONDITIONER, HAIR CREAM RINSE, NAIL POLISH, NAIL HARDENER, NAIL CONDITIONER, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, CUTICLE CREAMS AND CONDITIONERS, FACIAL MASKS, BAR SOAP, LIQUID SOAP, MAKE-UP, TOOTHPASTE, TOOTH GEL, NON-MEDICATED MOUTHWASH; SKIN, HAIR, BODY, HAND, FOOT, AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; SUNTAN LOTIONS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |