USPTO serial 75516683
INTERDISCIPLINARY MEDICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2293773Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 1999
- Examiner
- BAKER, CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERDISCIPLINARY MEDICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Califon, NJ
Califon, NJ
ASCEND MEDIA MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE, LLC
Overland Park, KS
Other trademarks owned by ASCEND MEDIA MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald M. Kraai
GERALD M KRAAI LATHROP & GAGE LC10851 MASTIN BLVDBLDG 82, STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1669Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND MEDICINE | EXPIRED | May 29, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GARDINER-CALDWELL SYNERMED
- Other trademarks owned by GARDINER-CALDWELL SYNERMED
- Other trademarks owned by ASCEND MEDIA MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named INTERDISCIPLINARY MEDICINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |