USPTO serial 75516805
LEVEL(3) COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEVEL(3) COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LON A LICATA
LON A LICATA FRASER STRYKERMEUSEY OLSON BOYER & BLOCH PC500 ENERGY PLZ 409 S 17TH STOMAHA, NE 68102-2663Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs to enable the transmission of information over a fiber optic network for the purpose of providing telecommunications services, namely, voice telephone and long distance services, facsimile and data transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |