USPTO serial 75516846
AVATAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVATAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE D CROMER
JULIE D CROMER MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely T-shirts, caps and sporting apparel, namely, sweatshirts and jackets distributed to participants in applicant's member's activities | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Council of Young Men's Christian Associations of the United States of America, The
- Other trademarks owned by National Council of Young Men's Christian Associations of the United States of America, The
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AVATAR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |