Drawing for AUTOLOGOUS GROWTH FACTORS

USPTO serial 75516952

AUTOLOGOUS GROWTH FACTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOLOGOUS GROWTH FACTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT D KATZ

ROBERT D KATZ COOPER & DUNHAM1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC BLOOD COMPONENTS AND ADDITIVES FOR ENHANCEMENT OF BONE GROWTH AND BONE REPAIRACTIVE—
010SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS USED FOR BONE REPLACEMENT OR BONE REPAIRACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 3, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance